Subject	You probably shouldn't use the v1 website propaganda as a
Posted by	Technomancer on May 23, 2006 at 12:02 PM
	This message has been viewed 87 times.
In Reply To	yet another reason to own a valentine >> posted by stockplayerz (NYC) on May 23, 2006 at 09:35 AM
Message	source of fact. [ http://www.1radardetector.com/ ] [ http://www.consumersearch.com/www/automotive/radar-detectors/ ] [ http://www.radartest.com/article.asp?articleid=9090 ] [ http://www.mybest-radar-detector.com/independent-tests-of-radar-detectors/index.php ] My point is, independent tests show that V1 is near the top always, and some years it is at the top. But very often it is not the top. On the other hand, V1 is almost always the most expensive. Purchase wisely. - John
Follow Ups	yet another reason to own a valentine >> - stockplayerz (NYC) 09:35:07 05/23/06 What other detector company lets you buy upgrades @ any $? (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 10:24:33 05/23/06 Bel, for one (n/m) - Technomancer 11:48:29 05/23/06 Informative read. - A R T I E M E A S E 10:32:13 05/23/06 I've had mine 8 years now... - bobZtwin (NC) 10:39:52 05/23/06 What Whistler do they test - the crap ones that have - dogpile (still dogpile) 11:07:08 05/23/06 my 3400 brain box died when i had my Z totalled. never - Halo Z 11:52:24 05/23/06 that sucks. Mine's been dropped so many times - dogpile (still dogpile) 12:23:03 05/23/06 You probably shouldn't use the v1 website propaganda as a - Technomancer 12:02:38 05/23/06 some you've listed are not entirely unbiased as well =P (n/m) - stockplayerz (NYC) 12:34:21 05/23/06 You could state which ones, and what their bias might be - Technomancer 12:47:03 05/23/06 "get V1" (n/m) - Guapo 14:01:00 05/23/06 Now that bias I can spot right away! ;) (n/m) - Technomancer 16:08:51 05/23/06 Thank you. Yet another unbiased individual. - ENVYMYZ 14:10:55 05/23/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.